The Senator Of The State Of Florida - 915 Words

Brenda Chavez MCOM 1113-14354 Informative Speech #1 October 29, 2015 Marco Rubio The Senator of Florida Specific Purpose: To inform my audience about the Senator of the State of Florida Marco Rubio, his family, his education, his career, and how do people perceived him. Introduction I. Immigration has always been a matter of controversy in the United States. Most of us have a foreign background or heritage. However, nowadays we can see major leaders in the world of politics and business that have different cultural backgrounds, and, if you are Latin American, Asian, African American, the Middle East or any other race, you might feel more identified with some of these leaders. II. As an example of one of these leaders we have†¦show more content†¦(Rubio, 2012) 1. His father was a bartender at the Sam’s Town Hotel. (Rubio, 2012) 2. His mother worked as a maid, cashier and retail clerk. (Rubio, 2012) C. Victor Garcia, Marco’s grandfather, who was also an immigrant from Cuba shaped his interest in politics since he was a little kid. 1. His grandfather told him stories of war and politics, and he explained him the differences between Communist Cuba and Capitalist America. (J. Rowley, 2014) (Transition: Now that we have talked about Marco Rubio’s family and origins, we will look into his education and political career.) II. Marco Rubio started his preparation in politics when he was in college. A. In 1993, Rubio graduated with a bachelor’s degree in political science from the University of Florida, and he continued his education at the University Of Miami School Of Law in 1996. B. He started serving in office while doing his master’s degree. 1. He worked as political coordinator for Bob Dole’s in 1996 presidential campaign. (Rowley, 2014) 2. He was hired during the summer after his graduation at the Cardena’s law firm. (Rowley, 2014) 3. He served as a city commissioner for West Miami. This was before he got elected to the Florida House State of Representatives in 2000. (Rubio, 2012) 4. He got elected speaker at the House in 2006. (Rubio, 2012) (Transition: Now that we

Why Immigration Will Do More Harm Than Good For Our State

For many years, the Midwest has been experiencing a severe population decline as young people leave for college and begin to start their lives in other, bigger, cities. According to authors Patrick J. Carr and Maria J. Kefalas, this decrease in population has caused many problems throughout Iowa, including an aging population, dying small towns, and fewer jobs coming to this state. For many years, the Midwest has been looking for solutions to combat this problem. For example, Governor Vilsack initiated the â€Å"Come Back to Iowa, Please† campaign in 2006, there have been various economic incentives to attract people back to their home state, and the â€Å"Cool Cities† initiative started in Michigan in 2003, are only a few. Although, a more controversial idea being considered is to attract more immigrants to our state in order to make up for the problems the Midwest has come to face, in recent years (Carr and Kefalas). Many people believe immigration will do more harm than good for our state, though there are actually many benefits that come with having them here: immigrants bring more culture and diversity to this predominantly white state, they are a boost for state and local economies, and they also help to reverse the decline in population. However, in order for the Midwest to see more of the benefits of immigration, there are still many changes that need to be done with federal, state, and local immigration policies in order to make it easier for these immigrants to enter theShow MoreRelatedWhy We Need Immigration Reform1168 Words   |  5 Pages Why we need immigration reform Immigration is important to America and so is Immigration reform. The laws we have in place are unfair and unsuccessful to all of us. In order to progress we need to look at our country’s past to advance in our future. Our economy and society can learn and advance with immigration reform. Our laws on Immigration need an upgrade and most politicians would agree that we need immigration reform also. Immigration reform is the renewal of our immigration laws, butRead MoreWhy We Need Immigration Reform1168 Words   |  5 Pages Why we need immigration reform Immigration is important to America and so is Immigration reform. The laws we have in place are unfair and unsuccessful to all of us. In order to progress we need to look in our country’s past to advance to our future. Our economy and society can learn and advance with immigration reform. Our laws on Immigration need an upgrade and most politicians would agree that we need immigration reform also. Immigration reform is the renewal of our immigration laws, butRead MoreImmigration Reform Is The Renewal Of Our Immigration Laws1111 Words   |  5 Pages Our laws on Immigration need an upgrade and most politicians would agree that we need immigration reform also. Immigration reform is the renewal of our immigration laws, but little progress has been made to make this a reality. Obama has made several actions to hopefully allow immigrants to have a chance to become citizens, but no new laws have been put into action. Presidential candidates speak a lot about immigration reform. Democrats tend to want laws to become more relaxed whileRead MoreIllegal Immigration Is A Hot Topic Debate864 Words   |  4 PagesIllegal immigration is a hot topic debate in today society as many people have their viewpoints on it. Immigration could be the second most talked about maybe first topic behind terrorism. Illegal immigration has been going on since foreigners were allowed in the US in the early 20th century. Even backed then, there were mixed emotions as many Americans did not favor foreigners and there were many attempts to restrict what they were allowed to do. Immigrants come across the border every day. AccordingRead MoreThe Legal And Illegal Immigrants1726 Words   |  7 Pagesthe way they work every day to support our household, is a discontented mind, it is a hard working mind, a mind that always thinks it has to work harder, acquire more knowledge. This is a generalization; they are plenty of exempti ons after all it is good to be hard working, it is good to want a better education for your children and to want a better way of living, everyone has the right to pursuit their dreams. I will focus on how immigration helps United States as compared to the mostly held view thatRead MoreHow Immigration Helps United States1600 Words   |  7 Pagesthe way they work every day to support our household, is a discontented mind, it is a hard working mind, a mind that always thinks it has to work harder, acquire more knowledge. This is a generalization; they are plenty of exemptions after all it is good to be hard working, it is good to want a better education for your children and to want a better way of living, everyone has the right to pursuit their dreams. I will focus on how immigration helps United States as compared to the mostly held view thatRead MoreEssay on The Role of Immigration on Legal and Illegal Immigrants948 Words   |  4 Pages The social issue that will be covered in this paper is the role immigration plays in daily life for both legal and illegal immigrants. This issue has seen a more prominent place as of late due to many events thought to have been caused by the allowing of members from disagreeing societies into America. The sociology of immigration involves the sociological analysis of immigration, especially with regard to race and ethnicity, social structure, and political policy, significant concepts includeRead MoreThe Framing Of Immigration By George Lakoff And Sam Ferguson906 Words   |  4 Pages â€Å"The Framing of Immigration† (Draft #2) The authors George Lakoff and Sam Ferguson in the article â€Å"The Framing of Immigration†, claim that the United States of America has poor and inefficient discussions on immigration because the nation takes this broad subject and wrongfully simplifies it by framing immigration. Lakoff and Ferguson support this claim by using hard evidence to demonstrate the nation is framing immigration by using the illegal frame, the security frame, and the economic frame.Read MoreThe Framing Of Immigration By George Lakoff And Sam Ferguson906 Words   |  4 PagesIn the article â€Å"The Framing of Immigration† the authors, George Lakoff and Sam Ferguson, claim that the United States of America has poor and inefficient discussions on immigration because when the nation frames immigration, this broad subject is inadequately simplified and therefore the debates and arguments are one sided and unfair. Lakoff and Ferguson further support this claim by using hard evidence to demonstrat e that the nation is framing immigration by using the illegal frame, the securityRead MoreImmigration Policy And The United States1713 Words   |  7 PagesMadie Fletcher SPEA V-160 Susan Siena April 2nd, 2017 Immigration Policy This paper will be discussing immigration policy, what fixes the United States needs to make to the current policy and what aspects should remain the same. This paper will first discuss what our current policy is, then transition its focus to immigration quotas, border patrol and security, and lastly discussing refugees. In order to reform the immigration policy, we must have an open policy for refugees. We will allow refugees

Social Movements

Question: Write an essay on Social movements. Answer: Social movements are purposeful movements which are organized and directed towards bringing about a drastic social change. The social change which is brought thereby is essentially brought to serve some kind of desirable change in the society. Although the economic sphere and the social sphere are deemed as two different entities, they are explained to be self-complementary in the theories of three great sociologists- Karl Marx, Max Weber and Emily Durkheim. On the one hand, Marx believed that economy I the very base of a society that is the ultimate determinant of societal superstructure. On the other hand, to weber, the society is nothing but an extension of the society, while to Durkheim, economy is one social institution that the society is composed of (Marshall et al. 2013 p 2) Marxism: Marx believed that each society has a ruling class and that particular section determines the ideology of that particular society. In collaboration with Engels, Marx wrote The German ideology, where the two authors reinforced the definition of ideology, as not something that is inherently right, but something that serves the purpose of a the dominant section of the society. According to Marx, ideology, in any society acts as a superstructure, where the socio-economic condition of the prevalent era is but only a base. According to Marx, the cultural production of the era will always comply with the thought pattern of the ruling class (Anderson 2016 p 15). Furthermore, Marx pointed out that the era of Feudalism was not an extinct concept in the prevalent era. The capitalist society of the eighteenth Century is an extension of the feudal form of society. While the feudal sections are no longer present, the society of the time, is clearly divided into two sections- the Bourgeoisie and th e Proletariat. While the former class, are the owners of the means of production, belonging to the group of traditional exploiters, the latter are the workers, who are exploited, in the process of offering their labor. Marx upholds that the proletariats are educated with the false ideology, something that gets reflected in the literature, philosophy or the legal system of the prevalent era. As Herbert Mercuse has also affirmed that the proletariats will be usually educated in terms of their thought process and opinion formation, in accordance with the capitalist theory. As such, even if the exploited section is trying to raise their voice, their views will be to a great extent conforming to the ideology and the principles of the exploiter section of the society (McMurthry 2015 p 32). Whether it is a matter of a religious institution, or an educational institution, the principal of the dominant class of the society will be found to possess a voice, and rigid control. Marx believes th at owing to this control over the ideology of the state, the stability of the ruling party is never brought into question. However, once the oppressed section starts understanding the process of exploitation they have undergone for ages, they start questioning the ideology of the ruling class; from this, emerges the revolutionary ideas of the proletariats which directly pose a challenge and threat to the activities, and age-old concepts of the bourgeois class of people (Parekh 2014 p 110).To the bourgeois section, labor is just another commodity, it is another means of production, and hence the exploitation can be carried out on the laborers, by increasing their working hours, reducing their wages, and offering them low quality working condition . However, as less opportunity of education is offered to the exploited section of the society, in very much consonance with the ideology of the ruling class to stop them from revolt, they cannot take up the necessary step. But gradually, wi th the formation of rad unions, materialization of a revolutionary idea, they aspire and strive to emancipate themselves from a rigidly controlled society of the capitalists. In the Communist Manifest, Marx pointed out that the motto of the capitalist will never be a classless society, but to widen the gap of class based distinction in the society. Hence, both Marx and Engels, pointed out that the capitalists will try their besat to reduce the wages payable to the laborers, and the latter should keep on striving to achieve the opposite (Alexander et al. 2014 p 90). The revolutionary ideals of the exploited class lead to the development of the trade unions, which work as an outlet for the complaints and grievances of the weaker proletariats. In reality, the bigger movements of the Great Depression had long-lasting effect, in recognizing the importance of the trade unions. At this time, the corporate class of people, recognized the legal right of the trade unions, and also accepted th e bargaining power of the laborers. Not only so, in the words of Marx, even mass media itself is a body which reflects the ideology of the capitalist class, as it is itself one of the means of production of the ruling class. Thus, whatever information and facts are revealed through media it will necessarily engender the ideology and the worldview of the ruling class of the society. As such, in a patriarchal society, anything that is shown on the television will essentially reflect the rightful authority of the male in the household, or it will justify the power exercised by the male member of the family. The media will thus voice so much of the views and opinions of the patriarchal society, which the ideology of the male dominating class, will appear to be the most normal, and socially accepted idea for the society. At the same time, the inhabitants of the society, who are acquainted and socialized into believing the ideology of the ruling class, they will never be easily able to qu estion the dominance and the precedence of the ruling class. Thus, in a patriarchal society, one will not easily come across a television show, which will exhibit the free spirit, or the uninhibited desires of a woman, as it might lead to feminist movement that would challenge and interrogate the whole system of patriarchy (Moueffe 2014 p 67). Hence, anything that would be opposing or contradicting the vantage point of the patriarchal society (the ruling class) will be censored. It is through this process of stifling the freedom of expression of mass thought, that the ruling class imposes a rigid control on the autonomy of the media. While this is called the materialist stance, it stands in opposition to the ideological stance. The materialist stance reflects the dominant ideology of the ruling class, while the ideological stance is that which reflects the ideology of the consciousness (Mommsen et al. 2013 p 41). Marx believes that the ruling class ideology, will only be allowed to be reflected as the most natural and rightful thing, and this helps in the creation of ideology in such a way, that any sort of contradictory viewpoint is regarded as an obnoxious idea. For instance, despite the presence of the trade unions, there was a huge lack of unity and co-operation among the workers, necessary to combat the exploiter class of the society. This was simply the result of the industrialization process, that was introduced by the capitalist society, which led to the less demand for laborers because of greater reliance on machinery. Because of this system, there was greater competition among the workers, and resultantly the competition prevailed, even when an unified force was needed for forming the trade unions. Thus, the whole system is locked and imprisoned by the ruling ideology of the state (Larrain et al. 2013 p 34).Weber:Webers view of social change, stood in direct opposition to Marxs idea. As opposed to Marxs point of view, that social change occurs in a s ociety only after there is a glaring instance of class difference leading to class struggle, Weber believed that social change can come either through a particular purpose or by an accident. In The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Max Weber points out that the emergence of capitalism in northern part of Europe occurred due to the Protestant, especially the Calvinist ethics, which encouraged in a compelling way, the masses to engage in materialistic activities, so that greater progress, in terms of financial gains could be witnessed. The point that Weber emphasized, was that in no way, did the Protestant followers, through their viewpoint, tried to express any greed or lust underlying such materialistic motive. Rather, they explained their ideology from a very morally justified point of view (Giddens 2013 p 89). Weber even argues by quoting Benjamin Franklin, whose speech for the masses, reinforces the necessity of earning more money, not for the purpose of mere wealth accumulation, but as a gesture of striving and toiling for future security. The Reformation, in the words of Weber, suggests that hard work, which is dedicated for getting greater wealth and prosperity, is an act of dedicating life to God. Weber further states, that usually religiosity implies denial and withdrawal from any materialistic or worldly affair of the world. But as opposed to this, Protestantism inspired the people from the pre capitalist era to dedicate their lives for greater financial rewards, and however, this view was not without the support of an ideological base. Rather, these were produced owing to already existing spiritual theories and doctrines, which highlight the importance of hard work and strong dedication to achieve materialistic gains as a means to achieve the higher goal in life. Weber further pointed out that during the Reformation period, the Roman Catholic Church was assuring salvation to the people who submitted unquestionably to their authority (Web er 2013 p 45). However, such assurance was totally missing in the Protestant period, and this created a huge lack of self-confidence among the people, as they started believing that some people are pre-destined to attain salvation, while others were not. In addition to this, was Calvins theory of double destination, which claimed that some people were pre-destined to attain salvation, while others were not. Thus, as there was a great absence of religious assurance regarding salvation, the people started finding out their own means of the same. Thus, apart from clerical service in the church, any vocation, that was associated with hard work and continuous efforts started getting associated with a way to attain Gods grace. Webber further argued that beside the glorification of hard work, the Protestantism resented the idea of extravagance, as it was a sin, and it also discarded the value of helping a beggar, as it believed in hard work and not in beggary. As a result, there was a huge accumulation of wealth, which led to the creation of Nascent Capitalism (Alexander et al. 2014 p 92). Durkheim: Durkheim spoke of the importance of social integration in the formation of a society. According to him, men are different from beasts; on one major point- their insatiable lust for more. The desires of men cannot be satisfied, the more the desires are met, the more men want. Thus, there arises a need for social regulation, which will exert a rigid control on the inordinate desires of mankind. But when the social regulations are no longer at work, it leads to the destruction of the creation of a state, known as anomaly, which will result in the disruption of order and law, in an otherwise socially regulated world (Durkheim et al. 2014 p 72). As opposed to Marx, Durkheim proposed a theory of Functionalism, which advocated that a sense of cohesion defines a society, rather than a sense of conflict. In his The Division of Labor in Society, he says, that ordinarily human being s are egoistical beings, thinking about and prioritizing their selfish motives and needs; however, a society regulates such selfish tendencies of human mind, by inculcating in the human minds the importance of certain values, norms and ideals, which are ideologically deemed to be correct (Durkheim et al. 2013 p 50). This process of educating a child, since his birth, about the importance of certain social values, creates a sense of collective consciousness, which ultimately creates a sense of unity, and integration in the society (Alexander et al. 2014 p 74). Even, Durkheim talks of the idea of division of labor, like Marx. However, unlike Marx, to Durkheim, division of labor does not lead to the class conflict, ultimately resulting in the disintegration of the social system. On the other hand, to Durkheim, division of labor implies, a process where most of the people are not doing the same work, and following their own specialized areas (Swartz et al. 2012 p 93). This , in no way, creates clash or conflict, rather it helps in creating a strong sense of solidarity, borne out of a feeling of inter-dependence on each other. According to Durkheim, a human being is full of inordinate desires and selfish motives, and he can become a human in true sense only through the incorporation of the social control upon him. But Durkheim notes that in recent times, the modern society, as opposed to the ancient one, is gradually moving towards individualism. This individualistic trait is pushing them to a feeling of prolonged emptiness and frustration resulting in anomaly and higher suicide rates. So, he talks of the importance of greater social integration required for the modern societies (Turner et al. 2016 p 11).Comparative Study of Marx, Weber and Durkheim : Marx points out that there is an inherent sense of conflict in the society, arising from the class-distinction. According to him, the state is run by a false ideology, representing the needs of the ruling class, and t he exploited class of the society, are absorbed and trapped in such an ideological perspective for ages (Halewood et al. 2014 p 171). On the other hand, Durkheim believes that this ideology reflects the moral purpose of the society, that through an ideological control, the society restricts the possibility of selfish and immoral acts. Again, Weber believes, unlike Marxs perspective, men were never imprisoned by a system of capitalism, but they themselves went to achieve the same, on their own (Da silva et al. 2015 p 159-179). In the present day world, the theories of the classical theorists of Sociology are still prevalent. Marx believed in the theory of socialism, where everyone would be granted equal opportunities, and in todays world, the NGOs are organized bodies which try to reach out to the needy ones as well, trying to create minimum balance in opportunity level. Similarly, as Durkheim talks of the importance of social cohesion, in present days, as sociologists point out, the gift exchange in Christmas or New Years Eve, reflects the importance attached to the concept of social solidarity (Dobbin et al. 2014 p 12)). Reference List: Alexander, J.C., 2014. Classical Attempt at Theoretical Synthesis (Theoretical Logic in Sociology): Max Weber. Routledge.Alexander, J.C., 2014. The Antinomies of Classical Thought: Marx and Durkheim (Theoretical Logic in Sociology) (Vol. 2). Routledge.Alexander, J.C., 2014. The Antinomies of Classical Thought: Marx and Durkheim (Theoretical Logic in Sociology) (Vol. 2). Routledge.Anderson, P., 2016. Arguments within English marxism. Verso Books.da Silva, M.C., de Souza, F.J.V., de Arajo, F.R. and da Silva, J.D.G., 2015. Scientific Methodology for the Applied Social Sciences: Critical Analyses About Research Methods, Typologies And Contributions From Marx, Weber And Durkheim. Revista Cientfica Hermes, (13), pp.159-179.Dobbin, F. and Baum, J.A., 2014. Introduction: Economics meets sociology in strategic management. Advances in strategic management, 17.Durkheim, E., 2013. Emile Durkheim on institutional analysis. University of Chicago Press.Durkheim, E., 2014. The rules of sociological method: and selected texts on sociology and its method. Simon and Schuster.Giddens, A., 2013. Politics and sociology in the thought of Max Weber. John Wiley Sons.Halewood, M., 2014. Rethinking the Social Through Durkheim, Marx, Weber and Whitehead. Anthem Press.Heywood, A., 2012. Political ideologies: An introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.Kay, A., 2015. The sociologies of law of Marx, Weber and Durkheim: a comparison and critical synthesisMarshall, B., 2013. Engendering modernity: Feminism, social theory and social change. John Wiley Sons.McMurtry, J., 2015. Structure of Marx's World-View. Princeton University Press.Mommsen, W.J. and Osterhammel, J., 2013. Max Weber and His Contempories. Routledge.Mouffe, C., 2014. Gramsci and Marxist Theory (RLE: Gramsci). Routledge.Parekh, B. and Parekh, F.B., 2015. Marx's Theory of Ideology (RLE Marxism) (Vol. 22). Routledge.Swartz, D., 2012. Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. University of Chicago Press.Turner, B.J., 2016. Rece nt Doctoral Dissertations:" The Social Origins of Academic Sociology: Durkheim". History of Anthropology Newsletter, 4(2), p.11.Weber, M., 2013. The agrarian sociology of ancient civilizations. Verso Books.

The Wave by Morton Rhue free essay sample

In the novel The Wave by Morton Rhue we see change occur in this novel when a classroom experiment designed to show students how to make people change and conform their behaviour to fit certain rules. The classroom experiment that the teacher created was the catalyst that caused throughout the schools behaviour and the students behaviour and attitude. Robert Billings is a student who rarely pays attention in class and is always getting low marks and sleeping in Ben Ross’s history class. We see this early in the novel when Ben Ross is going through his class marks and comes across Roberts mark. â€Å"The other D was Robert Billings, the class loser. Ross shook his head . The Billings boy was a real problem†. In this quote we get a brief description of what type of student Robert is and the use action words emphasises the worry in Ben Ross. After the first wave lesson there is a sudden spark in Robert. We will write a custom essay sample on The Wave by Morton Rhue or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Robert becomes a new person after the wave. Before the class commenced when all the student were walking in Ben Ross describes Robert when he says â€Å"He was a heavy boy with shirt tail perpetually hanging out and his hair always a mess. In this quote Ben Ross gives an outline of how Robert presents himself and shows lack in confidence. The use of formal language is used to describe how he looks. We first notice change in Robert after the first lesson of the wave when for the first time Robert is getting involved in the class instead of always sleeping. The second place we see change is after the class in the men’s room when Mr Ross watch’s Robert without him having any idea of him being and there and says â€Å"He was standing in front of the mirror tucking in his shirt and fixing his hair†. This strongly represents change in Robert after the wave lesson; it is as if The Wave has changed Roberts Perspective on things. Later through the novel we strongly see a positive change in Robert. From the class loser that always slept in class to a leader and Ben Ross’s bodyguard all because of the wave. But the change that we see that appears to be positive is negative. Robert thinks that the change is a real group or organisation and dosnt realize that is all a lie and just a classroom experiment the Ben Ross has created. The Wave made Robert feel like leader. For the first time Robert was felling something different in his perspective something good but in reality it was all a lie, mad up, it was still just and fake class room experiment created  by Ben Ross. All he positive change the Robert was felling was all a waste. We see how much the wave meant to Robert when Ben Ross finally decides to put an end to the wave. Robert doesn’t take the end to The Wave very well and we see this in the quote â€Å"he heard a sob and saw Robert leaning against one of the television sets, tears running d own his face†. This quote shows how much Robert how much feeling he had for the wave. This quote emphasises Robert how upset Robert is and showing us that he isn’t just upset he is heartbroken. This shoes us that change that is forced upon of change that is a lie may seem at first to be positive but as a result it is negative and at time damaging. Other types of change are seen on the character David Collins. David is a successful and popular student who uses The Wave to improve the football team. After the first lesson of The Wave David realises that this could encourage them and motivate them to do better. We see this in the quote when David is having a conversation with Eric and says â€Å"But that doesn’t mean it couldn’t work, David insisted†. In this quote we see that David is very enthusiastic about the wave and really believes that it can improve the football team’s results. We see the change in David’s perspective of the wave and by using an excited tone it shows us how much David supports his believe. David believed strongly that Appling the wave to the football team could make them win. They suffered a horrible loss and this caused David to completely change the way he thought of the wave. We also see a negative change in David due to the wave when Laurie tries to stop the wave and David and her have a fight over it. â€Å"Laurie you’ve got to stop writing stuff against the wave. You’re causing all kinds of problems†. In this quote we see that David is blaming Laurie for causing the trouble in the wave and because of this argument it cause the to break up because the rules and the spread of the wave. Due to this Laurie is further isolated and friendless. This is an example of how change can cause people to be neglected and isolated from a group that do not believe, or agree with its terms. David is a calm guy but due to the change in him because of the wave it causes his behaviour to change causing a violent outburst on Laurie and throwing her on the ground. This violent act causes David to have an epiphany that the wave hasn’t caused a positive change but a negative one. The song Father and Son by Cat Stevens represents the different opinions people have toward change. In the song the father doesn’t agree on the change and believe that there is no need for change. It is an emotional relationship containing complication in generation. The father dosen’t trust the son judgement and says he is â€Å"too young†. But the son tries to explain why he wants change â€Å"I try to explain, as I do he turn away†. We see that the father s caring for his child and doesn’t want things to change. In the song we are seeing two different generations that have different ideas on change. The father thinking that it change is not needed â€Å"it’s not time take it easy† and â€Å"for you will still be here tomorrow but your dreams may not† shows us that the father is trying to limit the sons dreams. The Son wanting change â€Å"I know I have to go† show frustration and a sense of having to leave as change is needed. This text represents change in people over time as generation find it difficult to communicate with each other. The visual the seven stage of man represent change in each person and that life is continually changing and is like a cycle. There is no single catalyst that causes change in this text; people grow get old and die. This visual represent change by 7 pictures of the same man throughout his life. If the first stage of the characters life he in young and smiling and holding a hand which represents needing support. In the next two figures the characters is still smiling but now has wide arm movement which represents a confident stride which show that he is looking forward to the future. The middle character is still smiling but has changed in appearance. He is now wearing a suit and has reduced his stride to a relaxed and confident walk. In the last three figures the man begins to start having a hunch and has now lost majority of his hair, is no longer smiling and is wearing glasses all these feature symbolise change and getting old. In the second last figure the man had almost no hair and is being support by a walking stick. In the very last figure the man has no hair and as a hand guiding him and a walking stick. This last figure links back to the first figure of the little boy they both are being supported and one is new to world and ready and the other is old and ready to leave. The visual represents change that happens to people over time were as the song Father and Son by cat Steven’s shows that change in people over time changes their idea toward change. As demonstrated in the texts the wave, Father and son, and seven stages of man change can be caused by a single catalyst or can be gradual and a part of nature as seen in seven stages of man where it is a cycle of life. Change to me is something that sometimes we aren’t even aware of and sometime we are and without change you have nothing to look forward to in life.

Poetry The Sorrow of True Love Flashcard

Poetry: The Sorrow of True Love

Intergenerational Attitudes in the Workplace

Intergenerational Attitudes in the Workplace Free Online Research Papers A common perception among more mature workers is that younger workers do not have the same attitudes and values that they had when they first entered the work force. As a result, many of these more mature workers fell that organizations that hire Gen Xer’s and Nexters are doomed to fail. While it is true that younger workers have different values and attitudes than their predecessors that do not necessarily mean that companies that hire them are doomed to failure. Organizations that can successfully engage and inspire younger workers through their corporate vision and shared values may succeed for many generations to come. Each generation has its high achievers and it’s not so high achievers. The â€Å"Traditionalists† from the World War II generation had â€Å"Zoot Suiters† and swing dancers. Baby Boomers had hippies, flower children, and Vietnam War protestors. The Gen X’ers and Nexters are no different. Since the end of World War II, each generation has felt that the generation succeeding them is not as ambitious or hardworking as they were. Today’s youth just has more outlets to express itself and the ability to display it more effectively than ever before. The key to improving or shaping employee attitudes, either younger or mature workers, is to improve job satisfaction and employee engagement. Employees that are engaged and feel satisfied with their jobs are more likely to display positive attitudes at work and work hard to succeed. For the first time in recent history, there are four generations of workers in the work force. While there has been little research on differences in generational values, intuitively one would expect values to change over generations. Traditionalists, or Veterans, are workers who grew up during the Great Depression and World War II first entered the workforce in the 1950’s and 60’s. They value hard work, maintaining the status quo, and respect for authority. They tend to be hardworking and practical and they place emphasis on maintaining a comfortable life and family security. Boomers, or Baby Boomers, were born after World War II through the mid-1960’s. They were heavily influenced by the Vietnam War, the civil rights movement, and women’s liberation. They brought with them a distrust of authority but tend to emphasize personal achievements and material success. They work hard but also want to be able to enjoy the fruits of their labors. Xers, or Generation X, have been shaped by globalization, two-career parents, AIDS, and computers. Xers value flexibility, options, and job satisfaction. They tend to be skeptical of authority. Although money is important, many Xers are willing to trade off promotions and pay increases for more leisure time and lifestyle options. In fact, Xers’ are less willing to make personal sacrifices for their employers than either of the other two generations. Finally, there are the Nexters or Generation Y. Nexters entering the work force have high expectations and seek meaning in their work. They grew up in the age of the internet, DVD’s, ATM’s and cell phones, so they tend to embrace technology and even take it for granted. Nexters seek financial success and desire the things that money can buy. (Robbins and Judge 123-125) Organizations that understand the generational diversity of their workforce and appeal to the distinct values of each group will be able to attract, recruit, and retain highly motivated individuals from across the spectrum, Differences between the generations have frequently caused divisions. The veterans distrusted boomers for their appearance and rejection of authority. Many Xers and Nexters attempt to emphasize their individuality by their â€Å"in your face† style of dress, tattoos, and body piercings. For example, in August 2008 an otherwise unnotable young man known as â€Å"MR Unstable† made international news when a 4 minute tape of him bathing in a sink at Burger King was posted in YouTube (youtube.com/watch?v=a1iyN7Y-jJQ). In the days following the posting it was viewed over 300,000 times. Copies and commentaries on the video have been viewed over a million times and MR Unstable has been interviewed on all major US television networks. I think most people who watched the video could relate to someone they know or have observed in the workplace. It’s fair to say that each generation feels that its succeeding generation has failed to measure up. This is most likely d ue to selective perceptions that older generations have about the succeeding generations. Some Xers and Nexters go to great lengths to display their creativity and individuality. Because we cannot assimilate everything that we see, we tend to give greater emphasis to what we perceive to be â€Å"extreme†, both positive and negative. Images of some baby boomers protesting the Vietnam War affected veterans’ perceptions of the entire generation. Likewise, images of celebrity Nexters such as Paris Hilton, Lindsey Lohan, and Brittney Spears behaving irresponsibly form the images that shape our perceptions of their entire generation. It is important to remember that while these celebrities may represent a portion of their generation, it is only a portion. They do not represent the attitude of their entire generation. For example, a company recently terminated a â€Å"Generation Y† female for safety violations, abuse of company property and horseplay on company time. At her exit interview, she was shown the security video tapes of her doing â€Å"doughnuts† on a forklift inside the warehouse and then jumping off the forklift onto the back of another associate that was walking nearby. Rather than acknowledge the possible damage or injuries that her actions could caused she wanted to know why she was not being given a warning prior to her termination. Up until that time, she had always been provided with multiple warnings and had never truly been held accountable for her actions. Contrast that to some of the soldiers, sailors, and airmen from our military. They are also from Generations X and, however their sense of responsibility and satisfaction from the job has led them to volunteer not just to join the Army Reserve but to volunteer for multiple hazardous duty tours in Iraq and Afghanistan in support of the Global War on Terror. Another factor that may affect attitudes of Gen Xers’ and Nexters is that fact that up until now they have not experienced a major economic downturn during their adult (wage earning) lifetime. They have not placed as much emphasis on job security as they have on other factors. If they lost a job or lost interest in a job, they could move rapidly to another. As unemployment climbs in our current economic crisis, job security is taking on new meaning and value for many of them. Finally, there is an element of truth to the perception that younger workers do not have the same attitudes and values as previous generations of workers. As noted previously, each generation of workers has somewhat different values from the others. For the most part, all workers in an organization are seeking some sort of challenge and job satisfaction. Younger workers generally find themselves entering the work force in entry level positions. These positions tend to be more physical or technical with less emphasis on creativity. These jobs tend to have average or below average job satisfaction levels. Increasing job satisfaction among the younger workers can be a key to early integration into the organization which in turn can lead to improved attitude and job performance. Successfully organizations will find opportunities to add meaning and value to entry level positions and ensure that the succession plan is articulated early so that new associates that value promotions an d additional responsibility have the ability to pursue them successfully. In conclusion, although the attitudes and appearance of younger workers are much different than those of past generations this does not mean that corporations and organizations that hire them are destined for failure. Organizations need to share their corporate vision with new associates them to integrate them into the organization. Associates that share and value the corporate vision are more likely to be motivated to ensure its future success. In some cases, some organizations may need to modify their corporate vision to include values that inspire and motivate Gen X’ers and Nexters. As mentioned above, each generation has or has had its own motivating factors. Successful organizations will be able to identify these motivators and integrate them into their vision and values and use them to attract and retain high caliber associates in the future. Research Papers on Intergenerational Attitudes in the WorkplaceTwilight of the UAW19 Century Society: A Deeply Divided EraThe Relationship Between Delinquency and Drug UseHip-Hop is ArtInfluences of Socio-Economic Status of Married MalesPersonal Experience with Teen PregnancyThe Effects of Illegal ImmigrationAnalysis of Ebay Expanding into AsiaMarketing of Lifeboy Soap A Unilever ProductAnalysis Of A Cosmetics Advertisement

Critically compare and contrast the major cultural and institutional Essay

Critically compare and contrast the major cultural and institutional features and predominant HR policies and practices in UK an - Essay Example Both the two countries managed a score of 35 points on power distance. Germany is seen to be highly decentralized while at the same time it is also strongly supported by a large middle class. The Key management in various institutions have to carefully take into consideration any co-determination rights that may exist, in addition to its leadership being continually challenged to display appropriate levels of expertise. Extensive control is also one of the factors that is strongly disliked in Germany (Hofstede Centre 2013). In comparison to this, the British society has been noted to be strongly advocating for and believing that any inequalities that may happen to exist between people should be greatly minimized. Hofstede also shows that there are some inherent tensions in British culture as pertaining to one not being limited to how far they can be able to progress in life irrespective of where they were born on one hand, and the relative importance of birth rank on the other hand ( Hofstede Centre 2013). ... In comparison to the British society, the German society attains a score of 67 on the Individualism score (Hofstede Centre 2013). German society tends to focus on parent-children relationships with little emphasis on uncles and aunts. German communication is ranked as being one of the highest scores globally in line with the accepted ideal of one being honest even if it hurts (Mooij 2007). With a high score of 66 points, the German society is highly regarded as being a mainly masculine society. Good performance is highly valued and the German school system is keen to spate children into several different types of schools when they reach the age of ten. The general sense is that people in Germany â€Å"live to work† and their tasks provide them with self esteem. In Comparison, the British society also attains a score of 66 in masculinity (Hofstede Centre 2013). The British society is also highly driven and success oriented. People in Britain also live to work and well defined a nd clear performance ambitions (Strangleman and Warren 2008). On the uncertainty avoidance score, the UK with a score of 35 is seen to be quite a happy nation (Gibson 2002). With the low score in UAI, the British as seen to be relatively comfortable in any ambiguous situations that they may happen to encounter. (Hofstede Centre 2013). The German score on the UAI index is also set at 35. The society tends to place a lot of importance on details so as to ascertain that a project has been well thought-out. Germans are seen to compensate for any high uncertainty on their part by strongly relying on their individual expertise (Mead and Andrews 2009). The